Back to Program
CRASH COURSE

IBD Crash Course: Foundations Intensive

25h 16 CME 10 Sessions

Module Overview

A comprehensive two-week immersion covering the entire spectrum of IBD from basic science to clinical practice. Designed to establish a strong foundational knowledge base before the monthly deep-dive modules begin.

Benchmark Source: ECCO e-Learning Foundation Modules + CCF/ACG EPA Framework

Learning Objectives

Understand the immunopathogenesis of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis

Apply the Montreal Classification and differentiate UC from CD from IBD-U

Interpret key biomarkers (CRP, fecal calprotectin, ANCA, ASCA)

Survey the current therapeutic landscape including all drug classes

Recognize the role of multidisciplinary team in IBD care

Teaching Sessions

2h
Lecture

History & Epidemiology of IBD: Global and Saudi Perspectives

Rising incidence in the Middle East, genetic and environmental risk factors unique to the Saudi population, and the accelerating epidemiologic transition that makes IBD a national health priority.

1Historical Milestones (30 min): From Wilks to Crohn to the Biologic Era

Samuel Wilks described ulcerative colitis as a distinct entity in 1859, differentiating it from infectious dysentery. Burrill Crohn, Leon Ginzburg, and Gordon Oppenheimer published the landmark 1932 JAMA paper describing regional ileitis — what would later bear Crohn’s name. The 20th century saw the introduction of sulfasalazine (Nanna Svartz, 1942), corticosteroids (1950s), azathioprine (1960s), and the revolutionary anti-TNF era beginning with infliximab’s approval for Crohn’s disease in 1998. Understanding this arc is essential because every therapeutic class we use today was built on observations from decades prior, and the field’s remaining unmet needs (fibrostenosis, perianal disease, refractory UC) remain in large part the same problems Crohn himself described.

Clinical Pearl

When a trainee asks why we still have no curative therapy, remind them that Crohn’s original 14 patients (1932) failed what was then the best treatment — surgical resection — with a 60% recurrence rate. We have made enormous progress, but IBD remains a disease of lifelong management, not cure.

Key Points
  • Ulcerative colitis was described 73 years before Crohn’s disease — UC is the older diagnosis
  • Sulfasalazine was the first disease-modifying therapy; its mesalamine moiety still anchors mild UC therapy
  • The anti-TNF era began with ACCENT-I and ACT-1/2 — trials every fellow should be able to recite
  • Despite 8 drug classes, ~30% of IBD patients still require surgery within 10 years of diagnosis

2Global Epidemiology (30 min): Incidence, Prevalence, and the East-West Gradient

IBD prevalence exceeds 0.3% across North America, Oceania, and Western Europe — the highest figures in human history. Meanwhile, newly industrializing regions (Asia, Middle East, South America, Africa) are experiencing accelerating incidence curves that mirror the 20th-century rise seen in the West. Kaplan’s four-epoch framework describes this progression: emergence, acceleration in incidence, compounding prevalence, and finally prevalence equilibrium. Most Gulf states are currently in the second epoch. UC incidence typically rises first, followed by CD roughly a decade later, as the environmental drivers continue to accumulate. The combined global burden will exceed 10 million people by 2030.

Clinical Pearl

The fastest-rising incidence is now in industrializing Asia and the Middle East — Saudi Arabia’s pediatric incidence is rising 5% annually. Training capacity and drug-access planning must get ahead of this curve, not chase it.

Key Points
  • Global prevalence now >0.3% in developed nations, approaching 0.8% in Canada
  • Kaplan’s four-epoch model frames where each population sits on the IBD transition curve
  • Pediatric-onset IBD is the fastest-growing demographic subset worldwide
  • UC typically precedes CD by ~10 years during the epidemiologic transition

3Saudi Arabia & GCC Epidemiology (30 min): Data from Mosli, Al-Mofarreh, and the National IBD Registry

Al-Mofarreh’s pioneering 2013 series documented a sharp rise in IBD presentations at Riyadh referral centers. Mosli and colleagues’ 2020 multicenter review reported Saudi prevalence approaching 35/100,000 for UC and 20/100,000 for CD — figures likely underestimated due to underdiagnosis outside academic centers. Saudi patients present ~7 years younger than Western cohorts (mean age ~26), with extensive colitis (E3) more common in UC and ileocolonic L3 disease more common in CD. Consanguinity-related clustering of pediatric-onset IBD and monogenic VEOIBD deserves special attention. The national IBD registry, launched through SGA, will be the single most important tool for understanding our unique phenotype.

Clinical Pearl

Saudi IBD is not just Western IBD in a different passport. Younger age at onset, higher rates of consanguinity-related monogenic disease, different smoking patterns, and Hijra calendar fasting rhythms all affect how we diagnose, treat, and follow our patients.

Key Points
  • Saudi IBD prevalence: UC ~35/100k, CD ~20/100k — rising
  • Mean age at diagnosis ~26 years, nearly a decade younger than Western cohorts
  • Extensive colitis (E3) more common at presentation than in the West
  • VEOIBD (very-early-onset, <6y) warrants monogenic workup given consanguinity rates
  • The SGA national IBD registry is the single best tool for understanding local phenotype

4Environmental Risk Factors & The Hygiene Hypothesis (30 min)

Over 20 environmental exposures have been linked to IBD risk. The strongest modifiers: smoking (protective for UC, harmful for CD), appendectomy (protective for UC only if performed pre-symptomatically), early-life antibiotic exposure (increases risk), breastfeeding (protective), urban living, diets rich in ultra-processed foods and emulsifiers (carrageenan, polysorbate-80, carboxymethylcellulose), and vitamin D insufficiency. The hygiene hypothesis — reduced childhood microbial exposure leading to Th2/Th17-skewed immunity — remains the dominant unifying framework and is especially relevant for rapidly urbanizing Gulf populations. Stress is a trigger of flares but not a cause of disease. Helicobacter pylori appears inversely associated.

Clinical Pearl

Ask every Saudi patient about breastfeeding duration, early-life antibiotic use, and urban-vs-rural upbringing. These risk factors help frame prognosis discussions and prevention advice for their siblings and children.

Key Points
  • Smoking: the single most potent environmental modifier — opposite directions in UC and CD
  • Antibiotic exposure in first year of life increases lifetime IBD risk
  • Ultra-processed food emulsifiers disrupt mucus layer in animal models
  • Vitamin D insufficiency is linked to higher relapse rates — check and replete
Key Takeaways
  • IBD was described in UC (1859) and CD (1932); every drug we use was built on observations decades before it was approved
  • Global IBD prevalence is now >0.3% in developed nations and rising sharply in the Gulf
  • Saudi IBD is younger, more extensive at diagnosis, and has a meaningful monogenic subset due to consanguinity
  • Smoking is the single strongest environmental modifier — counsel differently for UC vs CD patients
3h
Lecture

GI Immunology Primer: The Mucosal Immune System

A structured 3-hour primer in gut immunology — the barrier, innate arm, adaptive arm, cytokine networks, tolerance, and how each arm fails in IBD.

1The Intestinal Barrier (30 min): Epithelium, Mucus, Tight Junctions, Paneth Cells

The gut barrier is a three-layer system: the mucus (inner sterile layer + outer colonized layer), the single-cell columnar epithelium with its tight junction claudins and occludin, and the subepithelial lamina propria. Goblet cells secrete MUC2, Paneth cells at crypt bases release α-defensins and lysozyme, and microfold (M) cells over Peyer patches sample luminal antigens. Barrier integrity is measured in research via transepithelial electrical resistance and in vivo with lactulose/mannitol ratios. In IBD, claudin-2 is upregulated (pore-forming), claudin-3/4/5 downregulated (barrier-forming), producing the "leaky gut" phenotype.

Clinical Pearl

Every IBD therapy ultimately succeeds or fails at the barrier — a drug that calms systemic inflammation but fails to restore epithelial integrity will not produce durable remission.

Key Points
  • MUC2 mucin defects alone can cause spontaneous colitis in mice (Muc2 knockouts)
  • Paneth cell dysfunction is a hallmark of ATG16L1-mutated Crohn’s disease
  • Claudin-2 upregulation drives the leaky gut phenotype in active IBD
  • Zonulin is an emerging biomarker of intestinal permeability, but not yet clinically validated

2Innate Immunity (30 min): PRRs, Dendritic Cells, Macrophages, Innate Lymphoid Cells

Pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs) — toll-like receptors (TLRs), NOD-like receptors (NLRs), and RIG-I-like receptors — detect microbial associated molecular patterns. NOD2 (encoded by CARD15 on chromosome 16q12) senses muramyl dipeptide and is the single strongest genetic risk factor for ileal Crohn’s. Dendritic cells (CD103+) bridge innate and adaptive arms: they sample antigen, migrate to mesenteric lymph nodes, and instruct naïve T cells. Gut macrophages are uniquely anergic under homeostasis (high IL-10, low TNF) — this tolerance is broken in IBD. Innate lymphoid cells (ILC1/2/3) mirror T-cell subsets without rearranged receptors; ILC3s producing IL-22 are crucial for epithelial repair.

Clinical Pearl

NOD2 variants (p.R702W, p.G908R, p.L1007fs) triple the risk of ileal, fibrostenotic Crohn’s disease — but NOD2 explains only ~1–2% of overall heritability. IBD is polygenic, not Mendelian.

Key Points
  • NOD2 is the strongest genetic risk factor in CD but explains only 1–2% of heritability
  • Gut macrophages are uniquely anergic — loss of this tolerance drives inflammation
  • CD103+ dendritic cells are the key antigen-presenting cells inducing oral tolerance
  • ILC3-derived IL-22 is essential for epithelial regeneration after injury

3Adaptive Immunity (30 min): T-Cell Subsets, B Cells, IgA, and the Th17/Treg Balance

Naïve CD4+ T cells differentiate into Th1 (IFN-γ, classic Crohn’s), Th2 (IL-4/5/13, classic UC), Th17 (IL-17A/F and IL-22, pivotal in IBD), Tfh (follicular helper), and Treg (FOXP3+, immunosuppressive). The Th17/Treg balance is central — dysbiosis tips it toward Th17. CD8+ T cells and intraepithelial lymphocytes are increased in IBD and correlate with treatment resistance. Gut plasma cells secrete >3 g of IgA daily — the single largest antibody output in the body. Secretory IgA coats commensal bacteria to maintain immune exclusion. In IBD, both T-cell exhaustion (late disease) and excessive activation (early disease) coexist across different tissue niches.

Clinical Pearl

The Th17/Treg imbalance is not a downstream consequence — it is the mechanistic core of IBD. IL-23 blockers and JAK inhibitors work because they rebalance this axis directly.

Key Points
  • Th1-polarized inflammation → classic Crohn’s; Th2/Th17 → classic UC
  • FOXP3+ Treg deficiency causes IPEX syndrome with monogenic VEOIBD
  • Gut IgA production exceeds 3 g/day — most antibody output in the body
  • IL-17A is important but its monotherapy blockade worsened IBD (secukinumab trial)

4Cytokine Networks & Signaling Pathways (30 min)

TNF-α (macrophages, T cells): drives apoptosis of regulatory cells; blocked by infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, certolizumab. IL-12/23 share the p40 subunit; IL-23 uses p19+p40 and drives Th17; ustekinumab blocks p40, risankizumab/mirikizumab/guselkumab block p19 selectively. IL-6 signals via JAK1/STAT3. JAK-STAT inhibitors (tofacitinib JAK1/3, upadacitinib JAK1, filgotinib JAK1) act intracellularly. S1P modulators (ozanimod, etrasimod) trap lymphocytes in lymph nodes. α4β7 integrin (vedolizumab) blocks gut-selective trafficking via MAdCAM-1. Understanding which cytokine drives which phenotype is the foundation of rational sequencing.

Clinical Pearl

Memorize the three-target heuristic: TNF (broad), IL-23 (Th17-selective), and α4β7 (gut-selective). Every biologic decision starts by picking which of these three to deploy first.

Key Points
  • p40 = IL-12+IL-23 (ustekinumab); p19 = IL-23 alone (risa/mirik/guselk)
  • JAK1 selectivity (upadacitinib, filgotinib) aims to reduce off-target cytopenias
  • S1P modulators require ophthalmic + cardiac screening before initiation
  • Vedolizumab is uniquely gut-selective — preferred when systemic safety is paramount

5Oral Tolerance & Microbiome Crosstalk (30 min)

The gut must distinguish food and commensal microbes (tolerance) from pathogens (active response). Mesenteric lymph node dendritic cells present luminal antigens to T cells in a TGF-β/retinoic acid milieu that induces peripheral Tregs. Short-chain fatty acids (butyrate, propionate, acetate) produced by Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and other commensals feed colonocytes, reinforce barrier function, and expand Tregs via HDAC inhibition. Bile acids are both substrates and signals via FXR and TGR5. Dysbiosis — loss of F. prausnitzii, expansion of adherent-invasive E. coli — precedes IBD flares and is both cause and consequence of inflammation.

Clinical Pearl

Before you reach for a diet sheet, remember: no single dietary pattern reliably induces remission in adults. The Crohn’s Disease Exclusion Diet (pediatric data) and Mediterranean diet have the best evidence but still as adjuncts, not replacements for medical therapy.

Key Points
  • Butyrate from F. prausnitzii is the main colonocyte energy source
  • AIEC expansion (NOD2 defects) is mechanistically linked to ileal CD
  • FMT for UC has 3 positive RCTs but is not yet standard of care
  • Probiotics: only VSL#3/Visbiome has meaningful data (pouchitis)

6How Immunity Fails in IBD (30 min): An Integrated Model

IBD arises from a three-hit interaction: genetic susceptibility, environmental triggers, and microbial dysbiosis — all converging on a dysregulated mucosal immune response. Barrier defects allow microbial translocation. Innate sensing through NOD2/autophagy fails to clear intracellular bacteria. Tregs are outnumbered by Th17 effectors. Antigen-specific memory CD4+ T cells persist in the lamina propria and drive relapse even after mucosal healing. The chronic-relapsing nature reflects this fundamental failure of resolution — inflammation starts appropriately but cannot shut down. Therapeutics must address the specific arm that is failing: ustekinumab for Th17 overdrive, vedolizumab for trafficking, JAK inhibitors when upstream cytokine diversity is wide.

Clinical Pearl

Remission is NOT cure. Memory T cells persist in the lamina propria for years — which is why discontinuing therapy (even after deep remission) carries a 40–50% relapse rate within 12 months.

Key Points
  • The three-hit model: genes + environment + microbiome + immune dysregulation
  • Tissue-resident memory T cells perpetuate disease even after mucosal healing
  • Deep remission (clinical+endoscopic+histologic) still carries relapse risk on withdrawal
  • Mechanism-guided sequencing is the future — we are moving beyond one-size-fits-all biologics
Key Takeaways
  • The gut barrier has three layers (mucus, epithelium, lamina propria) — IBD is ultimately a barrier disease
  • NOD2 is the strongest genetic risk factor for CD but explains only ~1–2% of heritability
  • The Th17/Treg imbalance is the mechanistic core of IBD
  • Biologic sequencing starts with three targets: TNF (broad), IL-23 (Th17), α4β7 (gut-selective)
  • Remission is not cure — tissue-resident memory cells drive relapse on withdrawal
3h
Lecture

Pathogenesis Deep Dive: From Genes to Disease

An integrated 3-hour mechanistic tour connecting genetic risk, environmental triggers, microbiome, barrier dysfunction, and immune failure into the unified pathogenic framework every IBD specialist must be able to draw on a whiteboard.

1Genetic Architecture (30 min): NOD2, ATG16L1, IL23R, HLA, and Polygenic Risk

The International IBD Genetics Consortium has identified over 240 IBD susceptibility loci through large-scale GWAS. The highest-effect variants cluster around innate immunity (NOD2), autophagy (ATG16L1, IRGM), IL-23/Th17 signaling (IL23R, JAK2, STAT3, TYK2), epithelial barrier (HNF4A, CDH1), and T-cell regulation (TNFSF15). HLA associations differ between UC (DRB1*0103 for extensive colitis) and CD. IL23R R381Q is protective across all IBD forms and was the inspiration for the IL-23 selective biologics. Polygenic risk scores now explain ~20% of disease variance and may eventually guide risk stratification. Monogenic VEOIBD genes (IL10R, XIAP, TTC7A, LRBA, CYBB) are uncommon but must be considered in pediatric-onset disease, especially in consanguineous families.

Clinical Pearl

In any Saudi pediatric patient with IBD onset before age 6, monogenic testing should be considered — IL10R and XIAP mutations are actionable (HSCT is curative).

Key Points
  • >240 IBD susceptibility loci identified; NOD2, ATG16L1, IL23R are the textbook ones
  • IL23R R381Q protective variant was the translational origin of IL-23 selective drugs
  • VEOIBD monogenic testing is actionable — HSCT can cure IL10R deficiency
  • Polygenic risk scores explain ~20% variance, still research-grade

2Environmental Triggers (30 min): Smoking, Diet, Antibiotics, Appendectomy

Smoking doubles the risk of CD and worsens its course (fibrostenosis, recurrence after surgery) while paradoxically protecting against UC — nicotine patches induced remission in small UC trials but the adverse effects limit clinical use. Diet exposures with the strongest evidence: high intake of animal protein and omega-6, emulsifiers in ultra-processed foods, low fiber. Early-life antibiotic exposure (particularly <1 year old) increases lifetime IBD risk 1.5–2 fold. Appendectomy before symptom onset is protective for UC only when performed in the setting of true appendicitis before age 20. Psychological stress is clearly a flare trigger but not a cause. Vitamin D insufficiency is associated with higher relapse rates; replacement trials have mixed data.

Clinical Pearl

Smoking cessation is the single most impactful lifestyle intervention in CD — quitting reduces relapse risk by >40% and approaches the effect size of a biologic. Make it a prescription, not a suggestion.

Key Points
  • Smoking: doubles CD risk, protective in UC (nicotine not clinically useful)
  • Early-life antibiotic exposure increases lifetime IBD risk
  • Vitamin D insufficiency linked to higher relapse — check and replace
  • Stress triggers flares, does not cause disease

3Microbiome Dysbiosis (30 min): Pattern, Consequence, and Therapeutic Implication

Active IBD is characterized by reduced diversity, loss of Firmicutes (especially Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Roseburia), expansion of Proteobacteria (AIEC, Klebsiella), and altered bile-acid and tryptophan metabolism. These shifts are both consequence (inflammation alters niches) and cause (dysbiotic stool transfers colitis to germ-free mice). FMT has three positive RCTs in UC induction (Moayyedi, Rossen, Paramsothy) but durability is limited. Live biotherapeutics (SER-287, SER-301) are in phase 2/3 trials. Dietary interventions indirectly reshape the microbiome — CDED reduces Proteobacteria and increases Firmicutes and is FDA-cleared for pediatric CD induction as an adjunct.

Clinical Pearl

Probiotics are not one-size-fits-all. VSL#3/Visbiome has data in pouchitis prevention; all other probiotic claims in IBD are unsubstantiated. Saying "try a probiotic" without specifying strain and indication is clinical malpractice.

Key Points
  • Active IBD: ↓ Firmicutes, ↑ Proteobacteria, ↓ diversity
  • FMT: 3 positive UC RCTs, not standard of care, donor selection critical
  • CDED is FDA-cleared for pediatric CD induction
  • VSL#3 is the only probiotic with quality data (pouchitis)

4Autophagy & Epithelial Homeostasis (30 min)

Autophagy recycles intracellular components and is essential for clearing intracellular bacteria. ATG16L1 T300A variant (present in ~50% of Caucasians) impairs Paneth cell autophagy, leading to reduced defensin secretion and altered mucus layer — a key step in ileal CD. IRGM, LRRK2, and NOD2 all converge on this pathway. Recent work implicates endoplasmic reticulum stress and the unfolded protein response (XBP1) in Paneth cell dysfunction. The autophagy-innate immunity axis explains why some CD patients develop fibrostenosis: impaired bacterial clearance drives sustained granuloma formation and mesenchymal activation.

Clinical Pearl

If a patient has ileal fibrostenotic Crohn’s with a family history, think NOD2 + ATG16L1 phenotype — this subgroup tends to require early biologic therapy and benefits from proactive imaging.

Key Points
  • ATG16L1 T300A impairs Paneth cell autophagy — linked to ileal CD
  • NOD2, ATG16L1, IRGM, LRRK2 all converge on autophagy
  • ER stress and UPR (XBP1) amplify epithelial dysfunction
  • Fibrostenotic CD phenotype is mechanistically linked to clearance failure

5Immune Dysregulation & Therapeutic Target Mapping (30 min)

Each IBD therapy targets a specific dysregulated node. Anti-TNFs bind soluble and membrane-bound TNF, inducing apoptosis of activated T cells and macrophages. Anti-integrins (vedolizumab) prevent lymphocyte homing to gut endothelium via MAdCAM-1. IL-12/23 (ustekinumab) and IL-23 selective agents block Th17 priming. JAK inhibitors cross-cut multiple cytokines intracellularly. S1P modulators sequester lymphocytes in lymph nodes. Mapping these targets onto the immune cascade helps explain differential efficacy (vedolizumab slower onset but safer) and positioning (JAK for rapid UC induction; ustekinumab for TNF-refractory CD). The emerging field of precision IBD aims to predict response using tissue transcriptomics and peripheral biomarkers.

Clinical Pearl

When choosing first biologic, draw the cytokine cascade on paper and match the drug to the dominant driver. Fibrostenotic CD with high CRP + fecal calprotectin → think TNF or IL-23. Extraintestinal manifestations → favor systemic over gut-selective therapy.

Key Points
  • Anti-TNF: broad, proven, immunogenic — still first-line for severe disease
  • Vedolizumab: gut-selective, safest, slower onset
  • Ustekinumab/IL-23 selective: preferred in TNF-failure Crohn’s
  • JAK inhibitors: rapid UC induction but black-box MACE/VTE risk

6The Integrated Multi-Hit Model (30 min): Connecting It All

IBD is best understood as a self-perpetuating loop: genetic susceptibility primes an individual → environmental exposures (smoking, diet, early antibiotics) reshape the microbiome → dysbiosis stresses the epithelial barrier → microbial products breach the barrier and trigger innate sensing → failed autophagy/bacterial clearance sustains antigen presentation → Th17 overshoot overwhelms Treg counter-regulation → tissue damage feeds further barrier breakdown. Each therapeutic breaks the loop at a different node, which is why different patients respond differently. The goal of precision IBD is to identify the dominant driver in each patient and target it first — eventually using multi-omics (transcriptomics, microbiome, metabolomics) to guide selection.

Clinical Pearl

When explaining IBD to patients, use the "forest fire" analogy: genetics is the dry wood, environment the spark, microbiome the fuel, and immunity the wind. Therapy can reduce fuel and slow wind — but we cannot yet make the wood wet.

Key Points
  • IBD is a self-perpetuating loop — therapy must break it at the patient’s dominant node
  • Precision IBD will eventually use multi-omics to guide first-line therapy
  • No single therapeutic addresses all nodes — sequencing remains essential
  • Patient education built on this model improves adherence and shared decision-making
Key Takeaways
  • >240 IBD susceptibility loci; NOD2, ATG16L1, IL23R most clinically relevant
  • Smoking cessation is the highest-yield CD lifestyle intervention
  • Dysbiosis is both cause and consequence; FMT has UC data but is not standard
  • Autophagy dysfunction links NOD2/ATG16L1/IRGM to ileal fibrostenotic CD
  • Therapies map to specific immune nodes; rational sequencing is the future
2h
Workshop

Classification & Phenotyping Workshop

Hands-on 2-hour interactive workshop applying Montreal (adult) and Paris (pediatric) classifications to real clinical cases. Fellows leave able to assign and update phenotype classifications in real time.

1Montreal Classification for UC (30 min): E, S, Age

Montreal UC classification has three axes: Extent (E1 proctitis, E2 left-sided to splenic flexure, E3 extensive beyond flexure), Severity (S0 remission, S1 mild ≤4 stools/day, S2 moderate 4–6 with minimal systemic signs, S3 severe >6 bloody stools with systemic signs), and Age at diagnosis (A1 <16y, A2 17–40y, A3 >40y). Update extent after every colonoscopy — UC is a progressive disease and extension occurs in ~20% within 10 years. Backwash ileitis in pancolitis is NOT CD. Severity at worst time-point, not current. Age modifier may influence cancer surveillance and therapy choice.

Clinical Pearl

Always record UC Montreal at worst-ever documentation — if a patient was E3/S3 two years ago but is currently E1/S0 in remission, they remain classified as E3 for surveillance and therapeutic decisions.

Key Points
  • E1 proctitis, E2 left-sided, E3 extensive — defines surveillance and drug delivery
  • S3 severe UC requires hospital admission and IV steroid consideration
  • Age modifier (A1/A2/A3) influences long-term cancer and therapy decisions
  • Backwash ileitis is NOT Crohn’s — classic pitfall

2Montreal Classification for CD (30 min): A, L, B with p modifier

Montreal CD classification: Age at diagnosis (A1 ≤16y, A2 17–40y, A3 >40y), Location (L1 ileal, L2 colonic, L3 ileocolonic, L4 isolated upper GI — modifier when concurrent), Behavior (B1 inflammatory/non-stricturing-non-penetrating, B2 stricturing, B3 penetrating/fistulizing), with "p" modifier for perianal disease. Behavior evolves — >50% of B1 patients progress to B2 or B3 within 10 years. Location is stable. L4 upper GI disease affects prognosis and is often underdiagnosed without upper endoscopy. Perianal disease is a distinct phenotype with its own therapeutic implications.

Clinical Pearl

Upper GI endoscopy should be performed in ALL newly diagnosed Crohn’s patients — L4 disease is found in 5–15%, alters classification, and often requires PPI adjunctive therapy.

Key Points
  • L1/L2/L3 are mutually exclusive; L4 is a modifier, not a category
  • B1 → B2/B3 progression in >50% within 10 years — early biologic may prevent
  • Perianal "p" modifier is the strongest predictor of penetrating complications
  • Upper endoscopy at diagnosis identifies L4 in 5–15%

3Paris Classification (30 min): Pediatric Extensions

Paris classification extends Montreal for pediatric IBD. UC extensions: E4 added for pancolitis, severity S1 added for ever-severe. CD extensions: Age categories refined (A1a <10y, A1b 10–16y), Location adds L4a (above ligament of Treitz) and L4b (below Treitz), Behavior adds B2B3 combination category, growth indicator G0/G1 (growth failure is a CD-specific finding), and history of perianal disease retained. Paris accounts for growth, which is a primary outcome in pediatric IBD — linear growth velocity and weight-for-height z-scores should be captured at every visit. Very-early-onset (VEOIBD, <6y) warrants monogenic testing.

Clinical Pearl

In any child under 17 with IBD, measure and plot height/weight z-scores at every visit. Growth failure often precedes GI symptoms in Crohn’s, and is itself an indication for escalation of therapy.

Key Points
  • Paris age: A1a (<10y) vs A1b (10–16y) — A1a is the VEOIBD-adjacent group
  • L4a (proximal) vs L4b (distal) upper GI location — affects monitoring
  • Growth indicator (G0/G1) is a Paris-specific addition
  • VEOIBD (<6y) warrants monogenic workup, especially with consanguinity

4Interactive Case Workshop (30 min): 6 Vignettes

Six rapid-fire cases for real-time classification. Case 1: 22-year-old with bloody diarrhea, colonoscopy showing continuous inflammation from rectum to splenic flexure — assign Montreal (E2-S2-A2). Case 2: 14-year-old with terminal ileitis, gastritis, and perianal fistula, Z-score -2.5 — Paris (A1b-L3+L4a-B3p-G1). Case 3: 45-year-old smoker with ileal stricture requiring resection — (A3-L1-B2). Case 4: 8-year-old with pancolitis, severe at presentation — Paris UC (E4-S1-A1a). Case 5: 30-year-old with enterocutaneous fistula and colonic involvement — (A2-L3-B3). Case 6: 60-year-old with new-onset left-sided mild colitis — (E2-S1-A3). Fellows classify independently then discuss as group.

Clinical Pearl

Write the Montreal/Paris classification at the top of your admission note and update it at every hospitalization and every colonoscopy. Classification drift is the leading cause of undertreatment.

Key Points
  • Classify at diagnosis AND update at every colonoscopy/hospitalization
  • B1 → B2/B3 progression is a trigger for escalation
  • Extension in UC is common — never assume E1 remains E1
  • Consanguinity + age <6 = monogenic workup mandatory
Key Takeaways
  • Montreal for adults; Paris for pediatrics — always document and update
  • UC extension and CD behavior both progress — reclassify every colonoscopy
  • Perianal "p" modifier is the strongest predictor of complicated disease
  • Growth impairment is a Paris-specific indicator and drives escalation
2h
Lecture

Endoscopic Assessment in IBD

A focused 2-hour tour of the validated endoscopic scoring systems (Mayo, UCEIS, SES-CD, CDEIS, Rutgeerts) and the mucosal-healing framework that anchors treat-to-target in 2026.

1Mayo Endoscopic Score & UCEIS (30 min)

Mayo Endoscopic Subscore (MES): 0 normal, 1 erythema/decreased vascular pattern, 2 friability/erosions, 3 spontaneous bleeding/ulceration. Simple but subject to inter-rater variability. Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS) integrates vascular pattern (0–2), bleeding (0–3), and erosions/ulcers (0–3) for a total 0–8. UCEIS correlates better with outcomes than MES alone and is the preferred tool for clinical trials. MES=0 and MES=1 now both considered acceptable endpoints in STRIDE-II; histologic remission (Nancy or Robarts) adds further prognostic weight but is not yet mandatory.

Clinical Pearl

UCEIS of 0–1 is the emerging "deep remission" endoscopic target in UC. A Mayo 0 without biopsy confirmation still has a measurable 1-year relapse risk — consider adding histologic scoring in trial settings.

Key Points
  • Mayo 0/1 both acceptable endoscopic endpoints (STRIDE-II)
  • UCEIS 0–8, preferred for trials, better correlates with outcomes
  • Histologic remission (Nancy/Robarts) adds prognostic value
  • Document score at EVERY colonoscopy, not just baseline

2SES-CD & CDEIS (30 min)

Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn’s Disease (SES-CD) evaluates five segments (rectum, sigmoid/left, transverse, right, terminal ileum) across four domains: ulcer size, ulcerated surface %, affected surface %, and narrowing (0–3 each, max 12 per segment). CDEIS is the older, more complex score. SES-CD ≤3 is considered endoscopic remission; ≤6 is mild; 7–15 moderate; ≥16 severe. Document photographs of each segment. Score terminal ileum even when not visualized (affects interpretability). SES-CD ≤3 within 12 months of biologic initiation predicts long-term drug durability.

Clinical Pearl

For CD follow-up colonoscopy after treatment initiation, SES-CD is the single most important metric to document — insurance appeals, biologic continuation decisions, and clinical trial eligibility all depend on it.

Key Points
  • SES-CD ≤3 = endoscopic remission
  • Score 5 segments x 4 domains (max 56 total)
  • TI must be scored even if not visualized
  • SES-CD ≤3 at 1y predicts long-term biologic durability

3Rutgeerts Score for Post-Operative CD (30 min)

After ileocolic resection, ~65% of CD patients develop endoscopic recurrence at the neoterminal ileum within 1 year. Rutgeerts score at 6–12 months post-op: i0 no lesions, i1 ≤5 aphthous ulcers, i2 >5 aphthous ulcers or lesions confined to anastomosis, i3 diffuse aphthous ileitis, i4 diffuse ulcers with nodules or narrowing. i0/i1 = good prognosis (low relapse), i2+ = initiate or escalate prophylaxis (biologic or thiopurine). Modified Rutgeerts (i2a anastomotic vs i2b ileal) refines risk stratification. Early post-op endoscopy is a STRIDE-II recommended target.

Clinical Pearl

Every post-op CD patient should have an endoscopy at 6–12 months. Do not wait for symptoms — by the time they present clinically, the damage is done.

Key Points
  • ~65% endoscopic recurrence at 1 year post-op
  • i0/i1 = observe; i2+ = initiate prophylaxis
  • Modified Rutgeerts i2a/i2b refines anastomotic vs true ileal recurrence
  • STRIDE-II endorses post-op endoscopic target

4Mucosal Healing & Capsule Endoscopy (30 min)

Mucosal healing = absence of friability, erosions, ulcers (MES 0/1, UCEIS ≤1 for UC; SES-CD ≤3 for CD). Associated with reduced relapse, hospitalization, surgery, and colorectal cancer. STRIDE-II targets (in order): symptomatic remission → normalization of CRP/fecal calprotectin → endoscopic healing → consider histologic healing. Timing: re-assess 3–6 months after intervention. Capsule endoscopy (including colon capsule) is useful in isolated small-bowel CD without strictures, in unexplained iron-deficiency anemia with normal upper/lower endoscopy, and increasingly for monitoring biologic response. Patency capsule is mandatory before video capsule in known small-bowel CD.

Clinical Pearl

Never perform a capsule endoscopy in known CD without a patency capsule first. Retained capsules cause obstructions that can require surgery — this is an easily preventable complication.

Key Points
  • Mucosal healing: MES 0/1, UCEIS ≤1, SES-CD ≤3
  • STRIDE-II: symptomatic → biomarker → endoscopic → histologic targets
  • Re-evaluate endoscopy 3–6 months after therapy change
  • Patency capsule mandatory before video capsule in known CD
Key Takeaways
  • UC: Mayo 0/1 or UCEIS ≤1 = remission; UCEIS preferred for trials
  • CD: SES-CD ≤3 = endoscopic remission; document 5 segments always
  • Post-op CD: Rutgeerts score at 6–12 months guides prophylaxis
  • STRIDE-II hierarchy: symptoms → biomarkers → endoscopy → histology
  • Patency capsule before video capsule in known CD is mandatory
2h
Lecture

Radiology in IBD: Cross-Sectional Imaging

A practical 2-hour grounding in MR enterography, CT enterography, and intestinal ultrasound — what to order, how to read the report, and how to act on it.

1MR Enterography (30 min): Protocol, Findings, Reporting

MR enterography (MRE) is the imaging of choice for small-bowel CD assessment — no ionizing radiation, excellent soft-tissue contrast, can evaluate perianal disease simultaneously. Standard protocol: oral biphasic contrast (1–1.5 L mannitol or polyethylene glycol), glucagon for peristalsis, IV gadolinium. Key findings: wall thickening (>3 mm), mural hyperenhancement, mural stratification (layered enhancement suggests active inflammation), restricted diffusion, comb sign (engorged vasa recta), creeping fat, strictures, penetrating complications (fistulae, abscesses). Simple MaRIA and Lémann indices quantify disease burden. Reports should specify location by segment and distinguish inflammatory vs fibrotic components — key for medical vs surgical decisions.

Clinical Pearl

Ask your radiologist to explicitly comment on mural stratification and T2 signal intensity — these distinguish active inflammation (treat medically) from fibrotic stricture (consider endoscopic or surgical).

Key Points
  • MRE is first-line for small-bowel CD assessment (no radiation)
  • Active inflammation: hyperenhancement, mural stratification, restricted diffusion
  • Fibrosis: low T2 signal, delayed homogeneous enhancement
  • Simple MaRIA and Lémann indices quantify disease burden

2CT Enterography (30 min): When and Why

CT enterography (CTE) uses oral + IV contrast with thin slices and is faster, more accessible, and better for detecting abscesses and penetrating complications than MRE — but delivers 6–10 mSv radiation, limiting repeated use in young patients. Preferred in acute scenarios (sepsis, suspected perforation), small-bowel obstruction, and when MRE is unavailable. Findings parallel MRE. Dose-reduction protocols and iterative reconstruction have cut radiation by 40–60%. For most non-acute follow-up in young Saudi IBD patients, MRE should be the default. CTE and MRE have comparable accuracy for active inflammation and strictures.

Clinical Pearl

In the ED with an acutely ill CD patient, CTE is faster and better at detecting abscesses and perforations — do not delay diagnosis waiting for MRE. Save MRE for outpatient monitoring.

Key Points
  • CTE faster, more available — preferred in acute settings
  • Radiation 6–10 mSv limits repeated use in young patients
  • CTE comparable to MRE for active inflammation accuracy
  • Dose-reduction protocols reduce radiation 40–60%

3Intestinal Ultrasound (30 min): The Emerging Point-of-Care Tool

Intestinal ultrasound (IUS) is becoming the third pillar of IBD imaging — no radiation, no contrast, point-of-care, repeatable. A high-frequency linear probe (5–17 MHz) evaluates wall thickness (>3 mm = abnormal), wall stratification (loss = active inflammation), hyperemia on Doppler (Limberg score 0–4), fat wrapping, and motility. Kucharzik and colleagues demonstrated that IUS changes during TRUST IBD predict treatment response within 2 weeks. Operator-dependent but training curves are short (~50 supervised exams). Cannot reliably image upper GI or deep pelvic areas. Ideal for monitoring induction response and flare assessment in the clinic.

Clinical Pearl

Every IBD center should develop IUS capability. Two key windows — ileum and sigmoid — cover most IBD and can be learned in weeks. Bedside confirmation of flare vs functional symptoms saves unnecessary admissions.

Key Points
  • IUS: no radiation, point-of-care, operator-dependent
  • Wall thickness >3 mm = abnormal; Limberg Doppler 0–4 grades hyperemia
  • TRUST IBD showed IUS changes predict response at 2 weeks
  • Learning curve ~50 supervised exams

4Structured Reporting & Decision Framework (30 min)

Structured reporting (Society of Abdominal Radiology & ECCO-ESGAR templates) ensures every relevant finding is addressed: segment, length of involvement, wall thickness, enhancement pattern, T2 signal, diffusion, strictures (length, degree of narrowing, pre-stenotic dilation), penetrating complications, perianal disease, extraintestinal findings. Decision framework: active inflammation without stricture → medical escalation; stricture with active inflammation → medical + balloon dilation if short (<5 cm) and reachable; fibrotic stricture without inflammation → surgical; penetrating disease (abscess/fistula) → MDT (surgery, interventional radiology, biologic). Incorporate imaging into every MDT decision.

Clinical Pearl

Request structured reports from your radiologists. A narrative report that says "findings suggestive of active disease" is useless — demand specific wall thickness, stricture length, and T2 characteristics.

Key Points
  • SAR and ECCO-ESGAR templates define structured reporting
  • Active inflammation → medical escalation
  • Short inflammatory stricture → consider balloon dilation
  • Fibrotic stricture → surgical planning
  • Penetrating disease → MDT approach
Key Takeaways
  • MRE is first-line for small-bowel CD monitoring — no radiation
  • CTE faster and better for acute/penetrating scenarios
  • IUS is the emerging point-of-care tool — every IBD center should develop capability
  • Structured reports distinguish inflammatory vs fibrotic strictures — drives medical vs surgical decisions
3h
Lecture

Therapeutic Landscape Overview

A 3-hour tour of every drug class in 2026 IBD practice — mechanism, key trial, positioning, dosing, and safety — structured so fellows can confidently sequence biologics and small molecules.

15-ASA & Corticosteroids (30 min)

Mesalamine (5-ASA) is the foundational UC therapy — oral 2.4–4.8 g/day induces and maintains mild-moderate UC remission (ASCEND trials). Topical (enema or suppository) adds efficacy for left-sided/distal disease and should always accompany oral therapy in active disease. Has no meaningful role in CD despite historic use. Corticosteroids induce remission but never maintain it — prednisone 40–60 mg tapered over 8–12 weeks for moderate-severe flares; budesonide MMX (9 mg/d) for mild-moderate UC and controlled-release budesonide (Entocort 9 mg/d) for ileal/right-sided CD minimizes systemic exposure. Chronic steroid use (>3 months/year or >2 courses/year) is a quality-of-care failure and should trigger escalation.

Clinical Pearl

A patient who needs a second steroid course in a year has active disease, not just flares — escalate to steroid-sparing therapy. Steroid dependence is a quality metric — audit your practice.

Key Points
  • 5-ASA: UC only; combine oral + topical in active distal disease
  • Budesonide MMX for mild-moderate UC; Entocort for ileal/right CD
  • Prednisone 40–60 mg for moderate-severe UC/CD — never maintenance
  • Steroid dependence is a quality-of-care failure — escalate

2Immunomodulators: Thiopurines & Methotrexate (30 min)

Azathioprine (2–2.5 mg/kg/d) and 6-mercaptopurine (1–1.5 mg/kg/d) suppress T/B-cell proliferation via 6-thioguanine nucleotides. TPMT and NUDT15 genotyping BEFORE initiation is now standard — TPMT-low or NUDT15-variant patients require dose reduction or avoidance due to myelosuppression. Monitor CBC weekly x1 month, then monthly x3, then quarterly. 6-TGN therapeutic target 235–450 pmol/8×10⁸ RBC. Primary use: steroid-sparing maintenance and combination with anti-TNF to reduce immunogenicity (SONIC trial). Methotrexate 25 mg/week SC induces CD remission (Feagan 1995); less UC data. Important safety: lymphoma signal (hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma rare but feared in young males), non-melanoma skin cancer, pancreatitis, hepatitis.

Clinical Pearl

Never start a thiopurine without TPMT and NUDT15 genotyping — genetic testing is now cheaper than a single hospitalization for myelosuppression. Saudi populations have distinct NUDT15 variant frequencies.

Key Points
  • Azathioprine 2–2.5 mg/kg; 6-MP 1–1.5 mg/kg
  • TPMT + NUDT15 genotyping before start — mandatory
  • 6-TGN target 235–450 for efficacy; >450 risk myelotoxicity
  • Combo with anti-TNF reduces immunogenicity (SONIC)

3Anti-TNFs: The First Biologic Class (30 min)

Infliximab (Remicade, biosimilars): IV 5 mg/kg at 0, 2, 6 weeks then q8w; can intensify to 10 mg/kg or q4w. ACCENT-I/II established CD efficacy; ACT-1/2 established UC. Adalimumab (Humira, biosimilars): SC 160/80/40 mg then 40 mg q2w; GEMINI, CHARM, ULTRA trials. Golimumab: UC only (PURSUIT). Certolizumab pegol: CD only (PRECISE), PEGylated Fab fragment lacks Fc portion. Proactive TDM targeting trough levels (infliximab ≥5–10 μg/mL, adalimumab ≥7.5–10 μg/mL) improves outcomes. Immunogenicity (anti-drug antibodies) is the leading cause of secondary loss of response — combination with thiopurine or methotrexate reduces this. Safety: TB reactivation (screen with IGRA), HBV reactivation, serious infections, paradoxical psoriasis, rare demyelination, CHF class III/IV contraindication.

Clinical Pearl

Always screen for latent TB (IGRA) and HBV/HCV BEFORE any biologic. This is not optional — missed TB in Saudi Arabia carries a higher prior probability than in North America and can be fatal.

Key Points
  • Infliximab 5 mg/kg IV q8w; adalimumab 40 mg SC q2w maintenance
  • Proactive TDM improves outcomes — target trough ≥5–10 μg/mL
  • Combine with thiopurine/MTX to reduce immunogenicity (SONIC)
  • Screen TB + HBV before initiation

4Anti-Integrin & IL-12/23 / IL-23 Selective Biologics (30 min)

Vedolizumab (α4β7 anti-integrin, Entyvio): IV 300 mg at 0, 2, 6 then q8w; also SC maintenance. GEMINI-I/II trials. Gut-selective, exceptional safety profile — the safest biologic for elderly, immunocompromised, or cancer-history patients. Slower onset (response often not seen until week 14+). Ustekinumab (p40 IL-12/23, Stelara): IV induction (~6 mg/kg), SC 90 mg q8w maintenance. UNITI trials. Excellent choice in TNF-exposed CD. Risankizumab (p19 IL-23 selective): IV induction, SC maintenance; ADVANCE/MOTIVATE/FORTIFY trials — superior in TNF-refractory CD. Mirikizumab (LUCENT, UC) and guselkumab (QUASAR, UC; GALAXI, CD) now approved. IL-23 selective agents are emerging as the preferred post-TNF choice.

Clinical Pearl

For a patient with prior lymphoma, solid organ transplant, or recurrent serious infections, vedolizumab is the safest choice. For TNF-refractory Crohn’s, IL-23 selective agents (risankizumab) now outperform ustekinumab.

Key Points
  • Vedolizumab: gut-selective, safest class — slower onset
  • Ustekinumab: p40; risankizumab/mirikizumab/guselkumab: p19
  • IL-23 selective outperforms ustekinumab in TNF-refractory CD
  • Mirikizumab approved for UC; guselkumab approved for UC and CD

5JAK Inhibitors (30 min)

Tofacitinib (JAK1/3, Xeljanz): oral 10 mg BID induction, 5 mg BID maintenance (UC only; OCTAVE trials). Upadacitinib (JAK1-selective, Rinvoq): oral 45 mg QD induction 8 weeks, then 15 or 30 mg QD maintenance; U-ACHIEVE, U-EXCEL, U-EXCEED trials — approved UC and CD. Filgotinib (JAK1, Jyseleca): UC only, EU/Japan. Fast onset (response within 1–2 weeks) — ideal for acute severe UC avoiding IV steroids-dependent pathway. Oral route is a major quality-of-life advantage. Black box: MACE (CV death, MI, stroke), VTE, malignancy, serious infection (based on oral RA data in >50 with CV risk factors). Pre-initiation: lipid panel, TB/HBV screening, VTE risk assessment. Avoid in active smokers with multiple CV risks.

Clinical Pearl

JAK inhibitors are the fastest-acting oral IBD therapy — unbeatable for induction in moderate-severe UC. But their black-box profile means careful patient selection: ideal for young non-smokers without CV risk factors.

Key Points
  • Upadacitinib approved UC + CD; tofacitinib UC only
  • Fastest onset of any IBD therapy — 1–2 weeks
  • Black box: MACE, VTE, malignancy, serious infection
  • Screen lipids, TB, VTE before start; avoid in smokers with CV risk

6S1P Modulators, Positioning, and the Sequencing Decision Tree (30 min)

Ozanimod (S1P1/5, Zeposia) and etrasimod (S1P1/4/5, Velsipity): oral, once daily, approved for moderate-severe UC. TRUE NORTH (ozanimod) and ELEVATE (etrasimod) trials. Mechanism: trap lymphocytes in lymph nodes preventing gut homing. Require baseline ophthalmologic (macular edema), cardiac (AV block, bradycardia) screening, and vaccination update. Slower onset than JAK but fewer CVE concerns. Positioning 2026: moderate UC first-line alternatives to anti-TNF in young patients wanting oral therapy. Sequencing algorithm — first line: TNF or vedolizumab (UC); IL-23 selective gaining ground; JAK for rapid induction; S1P for moderate oral maintenance. In CD: TNF first for severe, vedolizumab for safety-critical, risankizumab for TNF-refractory. Never use two biologics concurrently except in VEDOKIT-style research settings.

Clinical Pearl

Building a personalized sequencing plan requires answering three questions: (1) How severe is the disease? (2) What are the safety constraints (age, comorbidity, fertility)? (3) What is the patient’s route preference? Match to class accordingly.

Key Points
  • S1P modulators: oral, slower than JAK, require cardiac/eye screening
  • Positioning 2026: first-line choices now include oral options
  • Sequencing: severity + safety + route → drug class
  • Never combine biologics outside clinical trials
Key Takeaways
  • Every drug class has a signature trial and positioning — memorize the landmark trials
  • Proactive TDM for anti-TNFs improves outcomes; combination reduces immunogenicity
  • IL-23 selective agents are outperforming ustekinumab in TNF-refractory CD
  • JAK inhibitors are fastest-onset but carry a black-box; select patients carefully
  • Vedolizumab is the safest biologic — preferred when systemic safety is paramount
4h
Case Discussion

Case Marathon: 8 Foundational IBD Cases in 4 Hours

4-hour rapid-fire case marathon covering the core foundational scenarios every IBD fellow must master by end of year 1 — new diagnosis, flare, ASUC, pregnancy, perianal, post-op, elderly, and biologic failure.

1Case 1 (30 min): New Diagnosis of Moderate UC

24-year-old woman, 6 weeks of bloody diarrhea 5–6/day with urgency, hemoglobin 10.8, CRP 22, fecal calprotectin 1,400. Colonoscopy: continuous inflammation from rectum to splenic flexure, UCEIS 5. Teaching points: Montreal E2-S2-A2; workup includes C. diff testing, CMV in steroid-refractory cases, TB screening, HBV/HCV, varicella/MMR titers, tuberculin, viral hepatitis serology. Induction options: oral + topical 5-ASA (if no response by 4 weeks → step up), systemic corticosteroids 40 mg prednisone tapered over 8 weeks, or go directly to biologic if severe/moderately-severe. Maintenance: 5-ASA 2.4 g/d or biologic. Counsel on pregnancy planning, vaccinations (no live vaccines once on biologic), smoking status.

Clinical Pearl

Before any biologic, complete the "pre-biologic checklist": TB (IGRA), HBV/HCV serology, HIV, varicella, MMR titer, age-appropriate cancer screening, vaccination update (non-live only once on therapy).

Key Points
  • Montreal E2-S2-A2 — moderate left-sided UC
  • Always test C. diff; CMV in steroid-refractory
  • Pre-biologic checklist is non-negotiable
  • Oral + topical 5-ASA outperforms oral alone in distal disease

2Case 2 (30 min): Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis (ASUC)

28-year-old man, known UC, admitted with 12 bloody stools/day, HR 110, Hb 9.2, albumin 2.6, CRP 120. Truelove-Witts criteria met. Admission protocol: IV methylprednisolone 60 mg/day, DVT prophylaxis (IBD increases VTE risk 3-fold), VTE prophylaxis even during bleeding, C. diff + CMV stool testing, flexible sigmoidoscopy within 48 hours. Day-3 assessment: if >8 stools or CRP >45 and stools 3–8 → Travis criteria for steroid failure → rescue therapy. Options: infliximab 5–10 mg/kg (accelerated dosing for albumin <25) or cyclosporine 2–4 mg/kg/d IV. Failure of rescue within 4–7 days → urgent colectomy. MDT with colorectal surgery from admission day 1.

Clinical Pearl

Start VTE prophylaxis on admission for ASUC even if the patient is bleeding — hospitalized IBD is the highest VTE risk GI condition. Missing this is a sentinel event.

Key Points
  • Truelove-Witts criteria define ASUC
  • IV methylprednisolone 60 mg/d + VTE prophylaxis from admission
  • Day-3 Travis criteria determine rescue need
  • Infliximab accelerated dosing if albumin <25
  • Surgery consultation day 1

3Case 3 (30 min): Perianal Fistulizing Crohn’s

32-year-old man with CD diagnosed 3 years ago, presents with 6-month perianal drainage. MRI pelvis: complex transsphincteric fistula with 1.5 cm abscess. Management: antibiotic (metronidazole + ciprofloxacin), EUA with setons by colorectal surgery for drainage, initiate anti-TNF (infliximab) — ACCENT-II showed superior fistula closure. Target trough levels are higher for fistulizing disease (≥10–15 μg/mL). Adjunct: combination with immunomodulator (SONIC), mesenchymal stem cell injection (darvadstrocel/Alofisel) for refractory complex fistula, vedolizumab has weaker perianal data. The MDT here includes colorectal surgery, radiology (MRI pelvis monitoring), and IBD pharmacy.

Clinical Pearl

For fistulizing CD, target higher infliximab trough levels (10–15 μg/mL) than for luminal disease. Abscess drainage with seton placement must precede biologic therapy — otherwise seeding an abscess is inevitable.

Key Points
  • Perianal CD requires MRI pelvis for classification
  • Seton placement before biologic therapy
  • Anti-TNF first-line; higher trough targets than luminal disease
  • Darvadstrocel for refractory complex fistula

4Case 4 (30 min): IBD in Pregnancy

30-year-old woman with CD on infliximab and azathioprine, pregnant at 8 weeks. Counseling: PIANO and ECCO pregnancy consensus — most biologics are pregnancy-compatible; infliximab/adalimumab transplacental transfer highest in 3rd trimester but no teratogenicity. Certolizumab pegol has minimal transfer (PEGylated Fab without Fc). Ustekinumab, vedolizumab compatible. JAK inhibitors AVOID — teratogenicity signals. Thiopurines compatible. MTX absolutely contraindicated (teratogenic). Disease activity during pregnancy is the biggest risk to the baby — never stop therapy for a well-controlled patient. Avoid live vaccines in infant for 6 months if biologic continued into 3rd trimester. Breastfeeding compatible with all biologics and thiopurines.

Clinical Pearl

The highest pregnancy risk in IBD is UNCONTROLLED DISEASE — not the medications. Counsel preconception to optimize disease first, then keep therapy through pregnancy. Active disease doubles the risk of low birth weight and prematurity.

Key Points
  • Anti-TNFs, ustekinumab, vedolizumab: pregnancy-compatible
  • Certolizumab has minimal placental transfer
  • JAK inhibitors and MTX contraindicated
  • Avoid live vaccines in infant x 6 months if 3rd-trimester biologic
  • Active disease is more dangerous than the drugs

5Case 5 (30 min): Post-Operative CD Recurrence

45-year-old man, ileocolic resection 9 months ago for stricturing CD (B2). Now asymptomatic. Colonoscopy: neoterminal ileum with Rutgeerts i3 (diffuse aphthous ileitis). Management: initiate or intensify prophylaxis. High-risk features (smoking, perforating disease, prior resection, <30 y, extensive disease) → start anti-TNF or vedolizumab or ustekinumab after surgery. Low-risk patients may start thiopurine. POCER trial demonstrated value of early endoscopy with step-up based on Rutgeerts score. Smoking cessation is mandatory. Imaging (MRE) supplemental to endoscopy for proximal disease.

Clinical Pearl

Every post-op CD patient deserves a 6–12 month colonoscopy — asymptomatic i3/i4 recurrence has the same prognostic weight as symptomatic flare. Missing this opportunity costs surgical redo rates.

Key Points
  • Post-op endoscopy at 6–12 months — non-negotiable
  • High-risk features → immediate anti-TNF/vedolizumab/ustekinumab
  • Rutgeerts score guides step-up (POCER trial)
  • Smoking cessation is a prescription, not a suggestion

6Case 6 (30 min): Primary Non-Response to Anti-TNF

35-year-old with CD on infliximab 5 mg/kg q8w for 14 weeks — no clinical/endoscopic improvement. Systematic evaluation: (1) confirm active inflammation (CRP, fecal calprotectin, endoscopy, imaging) — rule out functional overlay, stricture, abscess; (2) drug level + antibody testing — if low trough with antibodies = neutralizing immunogenicity → switch class; if low trough without antibodies = pharmacokinetic failure → dose intensify; if adequate trough with no inflammation = mechanism-refractory → switch class. Options after anti-TNF failure: risankizumab (strong CD evidence — ADVANCE), ustekinumab, upadacitinib. Do not switch to another anti-TNF after primary non-response without careful TDM evidence.

Clinical Pearl

Before declaring anti-TNF "failure" measure the drug level. Most "primary non-responders" are actually pharmacokinetic failures — inadequate drug exposure, not mechanism failure. Dose intensification often rescues them.

Key Points
  • Confirm active inflammation before declaring non-response
  • TDM guides decision: antibodies → switch; low trough alone → intensify
  • Post-TNF: risankizumab, ustekinumab, upadacitinib have strongest data
  • Do not switch TNF after primary failure without TDM evidence

7Case 7 (30 min): Elderly-Onset IBD

68-year-old man, new UC (E3-S2), hypertension, diabetes, prior melanoma, on aspirin. Considerations: higher baseline infection, VTE, and malignancy risk; immunosenescence reduces response to biologics. Avoid steroids-prolonged therapy if possible. Vedolizumab is preferred for its gut-selective safety. Anti-TNF still acceptable but higher infection monitoring. AVOID JAK inhibitors unless no alternative (MACE/VTE/malignancy black box most relevant in this population). Vaccination: pneumococcal, influenza annual, shingles (non-live Shingrix preferred on biologic), COVID. Colorectal cancer surveillance schedule unchanged. Drug-drug interactions: anti-TNFs + methotrexate with folate, watch nephrotoxicity.

Clinical Pearl

Vedolizumab is the biologic of choice for elderly-onset IBD. Safety margin over anti-TNF is meaningful, and the slower onset matters less when competing risks are long-term.

Key Points
  • Elderly IBD: higher infection, VTE, malignancy risk
  • Vedolizumab preferred for safety; avoid JAK if possible
  • Vaccination is critical: pneumococcal, flu, non-live shingles, COVID
  • Drug-drug interactions with common geriatric meds

8Case 8 (30 min): Extraintestinal Manifestations

40-year-old with UC develops painful red nodules on shins (erythema nodosum) and joint pain in knees (peripheral arthritis type 1). Management: type-1 peripheral arthritis tracks with IBD activity — controlling UC often resolves arthritis. Erythema nodosum parallels disease activity. NSAIDs worsen IBD — avoid if possible; use acetaminophen or short-course COX-2 with caution. Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is associated with UC (3–8%) and requires MRCP screening at diagnosis and annually. Uveitis requires urgent ophthalmology referral. Axial spondyloarthropathy (ankylosing spondylitis) does NOT track with IBD activity — anti-TNF preferred (vedolizumab gut-selective mechanism does not address axial disease).

Clinical Pearl

Axial spondyloarthropathy does not respond to vedolizumab because α4β7 blockade is gut-selective. In a patient with both IBD and ankylosing spondylitis, choose an anti-TNF (infliximab or adalimumab) for dual control.

Key Points
  • Type-1 peripheral arthritis tracks with IBD activity
  • Type-2 polyarticular and axial arthritis are independent
  • PSC screening at UC diagnosis and annually
  • Axial disease: choose anti-TNF, not gut-selective
  • Uveitis = urgent ophthalmology
Key Takeaways
  • ASUC requires day-1 surgery consult, VTE prophylaxis, day-3 Travis criteria
  • Perianal CD: MRI, seton, then anti-TNF with higher trough targets
  • Pregnancy: active disease is more dangerous than therapy
  • Post-op CD: endoscopy at 6–12 months, Rutgeerts-guided prophylaxis
  • Primary non-response to anti-TNF → measure drug level before switching
  • Elderly IBD: vedolizumab is first choice; avoid JAK if possible
  • Axial EIMs require anti-TNF, not gut-selective therapy
2h
Workshop

IBD Pathology Masterclass

A 2-hour live-microscopy workshop with a GI pathologist covering baseline histology, inflammation, chronicity, and dysplasia recognition — the features every IBD specialist should recognize before reading a report.

1Normal GI Histology Baseline (30 min)

Review the normal architecture that IBD pathology distorts. Ileum: villi-crypt ratio 3–5:1, Paneth cells at crypt bases, Peyer patches in submucosa. Colon: straight crypts of uniform depth (no branching), superficial columnar epithelium with goblet cells evenly distributed, muscularis mucosae continuous. Lamina propria cellularity — small numbers of plasma cells, lymphocytes, eosinophils — density increases from cecum to rectum. Key variations: Paneth cells in distal colon are metaplastic (abnormal). Basal plasmacytosis (plasma cells near muscularis mucosae) is abnormal and a chronicity marker. Crypt branching is abnormal. Recognizing normal is the foundation for recognizing abnormal.

Clinical Pearl

Paneth cell metaplasia in the distal colon is a sign of chronic injury — normal distal colon has NO Paneth cells. This single finding raises suspicion of chronic IBD.

Key Points
  • Villi-crypt ratio 3–5:1 in ileum, straight uniform crypts in colon
  • Paneth cells in distal colon = metaplasia = chronic injury
  • Basal plasmacytosis is an early chronicity marker
  • Lamina propria cellularity increases cecum → rectum

2Chronic Inflammatory Features (30 min)

Distinguishing IBD from acute self-limited colitis (ASLC) is the central task. Chronic features: architectural distortion (crypt shortening, branching, atrophy), basal plasmacytosis, Paneth cell metaplasia, basal lymphoid aggregates, villus blunting. Active features: crypt abscesses, cryptitis, erosion, ulceration, granulation tissue. UC typically shows continuous inflammation, superficial mucosa involvement, crypt distortion throughout. CD shows patchy/skip lesions, deep transmural inflammation, non-caseating granulomas (30–40% of CD cases), fissuring ulcers. Remember: ASLC can mimic active IBD but does not show chronicity markers — timing biopsy relative to symptom onset matters.

Clinical Pearl

Granulomas are found in only 30–40% of Crohn’s biopsies, but their presence strongly favors CD over UC. Always request multiple levels of biopsy tissue — granulomas may be missed on single sections.

Key Points
  • Architectural distortion + basal plasmacytosis = chronicity
  • Granulomas in 30–40% of CD biopsies — helpful when present
  • UC: continuous, superficial, diffuse crypt distortion
  • CD: patchy, transmural, granulomas, fissuring ulcers

3Differentiating UC from CD Histologically (30 min)

Features favoring UC: continuous rectosigmoid involvement, superficial mucosal inflammation sparing deeper layers, diffuse crypt distortion, no granulomas, no skip lesions, no upper GI involvement (usually). Features favoring CD: skip lesions, transmural inflammation, deep fissuring ulcers, epithelioid granulomas (non-caseating), ileal involvement, perianal disease, gastric/duodenal involvement. Up to 15% remain indeterminate (IBD-U) — do not force diagnosis. Backwash ileitis in pancolitis UC is NOT Crohn’s. Post-treatment histology differs — focal distortion can persist in inactive UC, which is expected and does not mean relapse.

Clinical Pearl

IBD-U (unclassified) is not a diagnosis of failure — 5–15% of cases genuinely cannot be classified. Forcing a premature UC or CD label can harm patients if subsequent behavior contradicts it.

Key Points
  • UC: continuous, superficial, diffuse — no granulomas, no skip
  • CD: patchy, transmural, granulomas, perianal
  • IBD-U: 5–15% cannot be classified — accept the label
  • Treated UC may show focal distortion — do not mistake for CD

4Dysplasia Recognition: LGD, HGD, Serrated (30 min)

IBD increases colorectal cancer risk (~2% at 10 years, 8% at 20 years, 18% at 30 years of pancolitis). Surveillance starts 8 years after diagnosis of extensive colitis, with random 4-quadrant biopsies every 10 cm + targeted biopsies of any lesion. Chromoendoscopy or virtual chromoendoscopy increases dysplasia detection. Low-grade dysplasia (LGD): preserved architecture, pencillate hyperchromatic nuclei limited to basal half. High-grade dysplasia (HGD): loss of polarity, full-thickness nuclear atypia, complex glandular architecture. Visible dysplasia (polypoid or nonpolypoid) can often be resected endoscopically. Flat invisible dysplasia confirmed by second pathologist → colectomy discussion. Serrated lesions in IBD (serrated epithelial change) have uncertain malignant potential — evolving data.

Clinical Pearl

Every dysplasia diagnosis must be confirmed by a second expert GI pathologist before colectomy. Inter-observer variability for LGD is 30%+ — second opinion can save a colon.

Key Points
  • CRC risk: ~2% at 10y, 8% at 20y, 18% at 30y pancolitis
  • Surveillance: 8 years post-diagnosis of extensive colitis, every 1–3 years
  • Chromoendoscopy increases dysplasia detection
  • Second pathologist mandatory before colectomy for flat dysplasia
Key Takeaways
  • Chronicity markers (architectural distortion + basal plasmacytosis) distinguish IBD from ASLC
  • Granulomas in 30–40% of CD — helpful when present, not required
  • IBD-U (5–15%) is acceptable — do not force a premature diagnosis
  • Every dysplasia diagnosis requires second expert pathology review before colectomy
2h
Assessment

Pre-Course Assessment & Individualized Learning Plan

A 2-hour structured closing session — baseline knowledge MCQ exam, EPA self-assessment, gap analysis, and creation of a personalized learning plan for the remaining 12 months.

1Baseline MCQ Exam (30 min): 50 Questions

A 50-question multiple-choice exam covers every crash course topic: epidemiology (5), immunology/pathogenesis (10), classification (5), endoscopy/imaging (10), therapeutics (15), and special populations (5). Fellows complete independently on tablets. Automated scoring reveals strengths and gaps. Target: ≥60% at baseline (passing standard). Questions are calibrated against ECCO e-learning item bank and reviewed by SGA faculty. Results identify individual weak domains to target during monthly modules. Item-response analysis allows comparison to international cohorts.

Clinical Pearl

A baseline score below 60% is not a failure — it is a starting point. Every fellow’s gaps are unique, and the monthly modules are designed around that reality.

Key Points
  • 50 MCQs across all crash course domains
  • Automated scoring reveals individual gap patterns
  • Target ≥60% baseline; item-response analysis benchmarks internationally
  • Results feed into learning plan directly

2EPA Self-Assessment (30 min): Rating Across 10 Activities

Fellows self-rate their confidence and supervision-level for each of the 10 ACG/CCF Entrustable Professional Activities using the O-SCORE scale: Level 1 — I had to do it (novice); Level 2 — I talked them through it; Level 3 — I prompted them from time to time; Level 4 — I needed to be there but did not need to prompt; Level 5 — I did not need to be there. End-of-year-1 target: Level 3 on all EPAs. End-of-fellowship target: Level 5 on all EPAs. The self-rating is paired with a faculty rating at module transitions and 360-degree feedback from nursing, surgery, radiology colleagues. Discrepancies between self- and faculty-rating are valuable learning opportunities.

Clinical Pearl

Self-rating above faculty-rating is common in fellows (the Dunning-Kruger effect). Embrace the discrepancy as learning data, not personal failure — identifying blind spots is what fellowship is for.

Key Points
  • O-SCORE scale from Level 1 (novice) to Level 5 (independent)
  • End-of-Y1 target Level 3; end-of-fellowship Level 5 across all 10 EPAs
  • Paired with faculty and 360-degree feedback
  • Discrepancies are learning signals, not failures

3Gap Analysis & Reflection (30 min)

Using structured reflection templates, fellows identify: (1) top 3 knowledge gaps from MCQ performance; (2) top 3 skill gaps from EPA self-assessment; (3) top 3 attitude/wellbeing gaps (time management, imposter syndrome, work-life balance). Each gap is paired with a specific learning resource: reading, observed clinic, supervised procedure, simulation session, or online module. Fellows meet one-on-one with their assigned mentor to discuss. The structured approach ensures gaps are addressed systematically rather than avoided. Emotional and professional development are included — burnout is a leading cause of fellowship underperformance.

Clinical Pearl

Allocate 1 hour per week to reviewing and updating your learning plan. Gaps that are named and scheduled are 5× more likely to be closed than vague intentions.

Key Points
  • Identify top 3 knowledge + top 3 skill + top 3 wellbeing gaps
  • Pair each gap with a specific learning resource
  • One-on-one mentor meeting to formalize plan
  • 1 hour/week allocation for plan review

4Individualized Learning Plan (30 min): Writing the Contract

Fellows draft a one-page individualized learning plan (ILP) covering the next 12 months. Structure: vision statement (what kind of IBD specialist do I want to be?), 5 SMART goals spanning EPAs 1–10, resources (reading, procedures, mentorship, conferences), timeline with quarterly milestones, and assessment plan. Sign plan with mentor — a formal learning contract. Plan is living — reviewed every month at module conclusion. Completion of plan is a graduation requirement. Template is based on ACG Fellow ILP and adapted for the SGA program. Saudi-specific competencies (local formulary, Hajj/Umrah planning for patients, Ramadan fasting counseling) are explicitly required.

Clinical Pearl

The best IBD specialists are made, not born. Write down who you want to be in 5 years, then reverse-engineer the steps. Your ILP is the first step of that plan.

Key Points
  • 1-page ILP: vision + 5 SMART goals + resources + timeline + assessment
  • Signed contract with mentor
  • Reviewed monthly at module conclusion
  • Saudi-specific competencies mandatory (formulary, Hajj, Ramadan)
Key Takeaways
  • Baseline MCQ establishes starting point and identifies gap patterns
  • EPA self-rating on O-SCORE (1–5) is the backbone of competency-based training
  • Gap analysis must cover knowledge + skills + wellbeing — not just knowledge
  • The ILP is a living contract, reviewed monthly and required for graduation

Assessment

Pre-course MCQ exam (50 questions) + EPA self-assessment rubric + individualized learning plan

Launch Interactive Assessment
50 MCQs + 10-EPA self-assessment with O-SCORE

Clinical Pearls

Always check fecal calprotectin before and after treatment changes — it correlates better with mucosal healing than CRP

The Montreal Classification should be updated at each visit — disease phenotype evolves over time

IBD-U (unclassified) affects 5-15% of colitis cases — do not force a premature UC vs CD diagnosis

Middle East IBD patients tend to present younger and with more extensive disease than Western populations

Smoking is protective in UC but harmful in CD — one of the few consistent environmental associations

Practice Points

1

Establish a systematic baseline workup for every new IBD diagnosis: labs, endoscopy with biopsies, and cross-sectional imaging

2

Start a patient registry contribution from day one — documentation quality determines research quality

3

Build a personal endoscopic scoring library — save representative images for SES-CD, Mayo, UCEIS

4

Learn the local formulary limitations — drug availability in Saudi Arabia differs from US/European guidelines

Key References

Kaplan GG. The global burden of IBD: from 2015 to 2025. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;12(12):720-727

reviewNat Rev Gastroenterol2015

Ng SC, et al. Worldwide incidence and prevalence of IBD in the 21st century. Lancet. 2017;390:2769-2778

meta-analysisLancet2017

de Souza HS, Fiocchi C. Immunopathogenesis of IBD: current state of the art. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;13:13-27

reviewNat Rev Gastroenterol2016

Satsangi J, et al. The Montreal classification of IBD. Gut. 2006;55:749-753

consensusGut2006

Al-Mofarreh MA, et al. Emerging IBD in Saudi outpatients. Saudi Med J. 2013;34:651-653

reviewSaudi Med J2013

Reading List

Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis — Pathophysiology

Abraham C, Cho JHNEJM (2009)

essential

Host-microbe interactions in IBD

Ni J, et al.Gut Microbes (2017)

essential

ACG Clinical Guideline: Ulcerative Colitis in Adults

Rubin DT, et al.Am J Gastroenterol (2019)

essential

ACG Clinical Guideline: Management of Crohn's Disease in Adults

Lichtenstein GR, et al.Am J Gastroenterol (2018)

essential

IBD in Saudi Arabia: Prevalence, patterns, and outcomes

Mosli MH, et al.Saudi J Gastroenterol (2020)

recommended

ECCO IBD e-Learning Foundation Module Set

ECCO Education CommitteeECCO (2023)

recommended

Competency Mapping (EPAs)

1
Diagnose and classify IBD
2
Assess disease activity and prognosis